Other Fields
Agency Scheme: 
NARANDPB0001
ADJUDICATION STRUCTURE
Hearing Level: Basic Structure
Name of Hearing Office (local name): 
Office of the Archivist
Name of Hearing Office (global name): 
National Archives and Records Administration: Office of the Archivist
Hearing Officer #1 (Title): 
Archivist
Hearing Officer #2 (Title): 
Designee
Are administrative appeals permitted from final decisions at the hearing-level stage?: 
No
Comments/Notes on Adjudication Structure: 

The National Archives & Records Administration (NARA) may suspend or debar a person for conviction/civil judgment for a number of violations, or other serious violations that affect the integrity of a program (see 2 CFR 180.800). The NARA adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines for procedure of these adjudications (2 CFR 2600). NARA regulations do not specify a debarring/suspending official; under the OMB guidelines, the default official is the agency head or an official designated by the agency head.

The OMB guidelines define the procedures as fair and informal, with flexibility in allowing the respondent to present matters in opposition without following formal rules of evidence.

Respondents have 30 days to contest a Notice of Suspension or Notice of Proposed Debarment.

PROCESS & PROCEDURE - General Information
Are private parties permitted to have representation at hearings?: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
Who may serve as a private party representative?: 
Either
Is the agency permitted to have representation at hearings?: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
Who may serve as an agency representative?: 
Either
Regulations/rules of practice for hearings (please include CFR citations): 
2 CFR part 180, Subparts G & H; 2 CFR 2600
PROCESS & PROCEDURE - Pre-Hearing Procedure
Is discovery permitted by either party at the hearing-level stage?: 
No
Does the hearing officer have subpoena authority?: 
No
Are ex parte contacts prohibited?: 
No
Are parties provided notice of hearing?: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
PROCESS & PROCEDURE - Hearing Procedure
What types of hearings are permitted at the hearing-level stage?: 
Written (Document-Only) Hearing
In-Person
How is the type of hearing selected: 
By Private Party
Required by Rule
Depends on Nature of Case/Claim
Please describe: 
Respondents may contest a suspension/debarment by presenting the suspending/debarring official with information -- orally or in writing (at their discretion, though "important" information should also be presented in writing if first presented orally) -- in opposition to the adverse action. Such presentations, if oral, are in the nature of informal meetings. (2 C.F.R. 180.720, 180.740, 180.815, 180.835). Respondents may also have an "additional opportunity" to present evidence at a more trial-type hearing if the suspending/debarring official determines there is genuine dispute over facts material to the suspension or debarment. (2 C.F.R. 180.735, 180.745, 180.830, 180.840). Suspending/debarring officials may, at their discretion, refer disputed material facts to "another official" for a fact-finding hearing. (2 CFR 180.750(b), 180.845(c)).
How many hearing officers preside at each hearing?: 
One
Is witness testimony permitted at hearings?: 
Varies by Case
If "Varies by Case," please describe: 
If a fact-finding hearing is conducted, witnesses may be presented. (2 C.F.R. 180.745(a)(1), 180.840(a)(1)). Inapplicable to document-only hearings or oral presentations (meetings) with suspending/debarring officials.
Can parties cross-examine witnesses?: 
Varies by Case
If "Varies by Case," please describe: 
If a fact-finding hearing is conducted, cross-examination of witnesses is permitted. (2 C.F.R. 180.745(a)(1), 180.840(a)(1)). Inapplicable to document-only hearings or oral presentations (meetings) with suspending/debarring officials.
Can third-parties submit amicus briefs and/or evidence?: 
No
Are hearings recorded and/or transcribed?: 
Yes
PROCESS & PROCEDURE - Post-Hearing Procedure
Who typically drafts the decision at the hearing-level stage?: 
Adjudication Officer
Other
If "Other," please specify (drafts): 
Suspending/debarring officials may, at their discretion, refer disputed material facts to "another official" (unspecified in regulations) to have him/her conduct a fact-finding hearing. When referred, the suspending/debarring official may only reject findings by the fact-finding official "after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous." (2 CFR 180.750(b), 180.845(c)).
Who has authority to issue final decisions?: 
Adjudication Officer
Do agency regulations or guidance provide time limits for issuance of final decisions?: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
If "Yes," please specify these time limit(s): 
The suspending/debarring official must issue a written decision within 45 days of closing the official record. May be extended for good cause. (2 C.F.R. 180.755(a), 180.870(a)).
Is judicial review available after issuance of a final decision?: 
No
PROCESS & PROCEDURE - Case Management
Does the agency permit web-based electronic filing of hearing-related briefs or other documents?: 
No
Are final decisions published and/or posted on the agency website?: 
No
Do agency regulations/rules of practice specify the contents of the administrative record at the hearing-level stage?: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
If "Yes," please provide citation(s): 
2 CFR 180.750(a), 180.845(a)
Do agency regulations/rules of practice provide for closure of the record at the hearing-level stage (subject to applicable exce: 
Yes (All Types of Cases)
If "Yes," please provide citation(s): 
2 CFR 180.755, 180.870(a)
PROCESS & PROCEDURE - Comments
Comments/Notes on Hearing-Level Process & Procedures (Optional): 
NARA regulations permit the debarred person to request reconsideration (by the the debarring official) of his/her debarment decision, or to seek reduction in the scope or length of the debarment. (2 CFR 180.875) All final decisions imposing a suspension or debarment are "published" in the sense that information concerning such suspension/debarment is required to be posted on the government-wide Excluded Parties List System (EPLS). Federal agency officials use the EPLS to determine whether or not to enter into transactions.
Verified by Agency: 
Not verified