Which party (or parties) is/are permitted to file appeals with this office?:
Private Party
Are private parties permitted to have representation at appeal hearings?:
Yes (All Types of Cases)
Who may serve as a private party representative?:
Either
About what percentage of private parties were represented at hearings (FY2013)?:
95.00%
Is the agency permitted to have representation at appeal hearings?:
N/A (e.g., Agency Not Party to Hearing)
Are ex parte contacts prohibited?:
Yes (All Types of Cases)
Regulations/rules of practice for appeal hearings (please include CFR citations):
49 CFR 1108.11, 1115.1, 1115.4-1115.9
What types of hearings are permitted on appeals adjudicated by this office?:
Written (Document-Only) Hearing
Please provide the approximate percentage of each type of hearing relative to the total number of appeal hearings (FY2013)Written (Document-Only) Hearing:100%
How is the type of hearing selected for appeals heard by this office?:
Required by Rule
How many appeal officers preside at each hearing?:
Three
Is factual development permitted at the appellate hearing as a means of supplementing the record from below?:
Yes (Some Types of Cases)
Can third-parties submit amicus briefs and/or evidence?:
Adjudication Officer Discretion
Are appeal hearings recorded and/or transcribed?:
N/A (Document-Only Hearings)
Are appeal hearings open to the public?:
N/A (Document-Only Hearing)
Who typically drafts final decisions on appellate cases adjudicated by this office?:
Staff Attorney
Do agency regulations or guidance provide time limits for issuance of final decisions on appellate cases?:
No
About how long does it take on average—as of FY2013—to adjudicate appeals by this office?:
180 Days
Is judicial review available after issuance of a final decision on appellate cases adjudicated by this office?:
Yes (All Types of Cases)
How are claims/cases processed at this appellate office?:
Differentiated Case Management
Please briefly describe your case management practice(s) at this office:
The Board is a small agency and must prioritize its case based on immediacy and efficiency.
Does the agency permit web-based electronic filing of briefs or other documents in cases adjudicated by this appellate office?:
Yes
Are final decisions issued by this appellate office published and/or posted on the agency website?:
Yes (All Decisions)
Do agency regulations/rules of practice specify the contents of the administrative record on appeals heard by this office?:
No
Do agency regulations/rules of practice provide for closure of the record on appeals heard by this office?:
No
Comments/Notes on Appellate Process & Procedures (Optional):
While practitioners before the Board are not required to be attorneys, there are extensive educational/experience requirements and a test for non-attorneys to appear before the Board. STB regulations also set forth a code of ethics for practitioners. (49 CFR Part 1103.)
Total # of Appeal Officers:
3
Is ADR available at one or more points for appellate cases heard by this office?:
Yes
If "Yes," when is ADR available?:
Before Claim/Case Filed
Pre-Hearing
Is ADR a mandatory or voluntary process?:
Voluntary
What type(s) of ADR are available?:
Mediation
Settlement Conference
If "Other," please specify::
The Board supports ADR in all cases.
Who conducts the ADR?:
Third-Party Neutral
Other
If "Other," please specify::
Appeal-level ADR would be party-directed mediation.
Regulations/rules of practice governing ADR process (please include CFR citations):
None that specifically pertain to appeal-level proceedings.
Other published guidance on ADR process (if any)::
None.
Total # Cases Filed/Opened (FY2013):
10
Total # Cases Decided/Closed (FY2013):
8
Total # Cases Pending (End of FY2013):
10
Does your agency maintain annual caseload statistics for this hearing office by case type (e.g., discrimination complaint, licen:
No
Do you have any additional comments about your agency's responses on this form? If so, please provide comments below.:
No.
Are there distinctive or innovative features of the appellate-level adjudication program covered on this form that you wish to:
No.
Setting aside budgetary or legislative constraints (if any), does your agency have a "wish list" of processes or procedures (e.g:
No.
Do you have any suggestions or comments about this federal administrative adjudication study?:
No.
Verified by Agency:
Verified